October 15th, 2011 | 
Author: If there was some type of emergency. A flood, a fire, a terror attack that kills 100 people, a cyber threat, a flu outbreak that kills a dozen, should the president be allowed to take over every branch of government and every business?
“Homeland Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20/51″
*Pros and cons please
FIX PC ERRORS
PC Integrity Scanner
Know What Happens on YOUR PC
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Posted in Computer Security Training | 
Tags: activities, business, government, Over, Power, President, should, take
Yes, You can’t count on the Mayor of New Orleans or the governor of Louisiana to help.
Sr. Chavez believes the answer to your question is “YES”, and he doesn’t think any emergency is required. That’s a dictator for you.
In an emergency of specified type, there may be a case for such authority. I suggest filing suit in Federal District Court to force the issue of what and when constitutes such an emergency under the law.
To a certain extent yes because when there is a crisis people need a leader to delegate duties. so we would need the presient to take over and run all the government and business activities. No because when someone gets to be a leader they tend to do what they want when they want therefore creating other unnecessary problems in the country..
Nazi Germany and other places tried that type of “government”, I think it’s called a dictatorship. Doesn’t seem to work too well where ever it’s tried. So, NO !!